• Humanism: A Defense Ng, Karen 2021 Philosophical Topics , Vol. 49 , Issue 1 , S. 145 ff. ( Zeitschrift ) Englisch 0276-2080 | 2154-154X 10.5840/philtopics20214919 Abstract

    This paper develops an approach to humanist social critique that combines insights from Marx and Fanon. I argue that the concept of the human operative in humanist social critique should be understood both as the normative background against which questions of human flourishing and dehumanization can come into view, and as the evolving demand for universal human emancipation. Far from being abstract, essentialist, or ahistorical, Marx and Fanon show that humanist social critique operates through a dialectic between particular, socially and historically situated forms of oppression and struggle, and the universal species-context of the human life-form in which particular forms of suffering and injustice can come into view as instances of dehumanization. In developing this approach to humanist social critique, I defend humanism against three prominent objections: the charge of speciesism, the charge of essentialism, and the recent charge from Kate Manne who argues that humanism underdescribes relations of social antagonism and that recognition of humanity is compatible with inhumane treatment. In addition to considering the necessary relation between the particular and the universal, I also consider the relation between the psychological and social/political, arguing against the recent approach to the problem of dehumanization in the work of David Livingstone Smith.

    Schlagwörter

    Analytic Philosophy | General Interest | Philosophy of Mind

    Loading...
Ng, Karen
Analytic Philosophy
General Interest
Philosophy of Mind

  • keine externen Weblinks