Zugriff nicht möglich

Sie müssen angemeldet sein und ausreichende Berechtigungen haben, um Zugriff auf diese Seite zu erhalten.

  • Further Reflections on Quasi-factivism: A Reply to Baumann Shaffer, Michael J. 2022 Logos & Episteme , Vol. 13 , Issue 2 , S. 207 ff. ( Zeitschrift ) Englisch 2069-0533 | 2069-3052 10.5840/logos-episteme202213216 Abstract

    This paper is a constructive response to Peter Baumann’s comments concerning the argument from inconsistency and explosion that was originally introduced in “Can Knowledge Really be Non-factive?” Specifically, this paper deals with Baumann’s two suggestions for how quasi-factivists might avoid this argument and it shows that they are both problematic. As such, his paper extends and strengthens the case against the view that knowledge is not factive, i.e. the view that knowledge implies that what is known is true or approximately true.

    Schlagwörter

    Analytic Philosophy | Contemporary Philosophy | Philosophy of Mind

    Loading...