Zugriff nicht möglich

Sie müssen angemeldet sein und ausreichende Berechtigungen haben, um Zugriff auf diese Seite zu erhalten.

  • A New Concept of Reason? Feenberg, Andrew 2022 Epistemology & Philosophy of Science , Vol. 59 , Issue 4 , S. 189 ff. ( Zeitschrift ) Russisch 1811-833X | 2311-7133 Abstract

    In One-Dimensional Man, Herbert Marcuse followed Husserl in arguing that modern natural science translates concepts and practices from the Lebenswelt, the everyday lifeworld. Marcuse claimed that a socialist revolution would change that life-world and transform natural science. He anticipated a new concept of reason that would incorporate potentialities experienced in the lifeworld. Teleological aspects of everyday experience would be “materialized” by science. Marcuse’s critique of social science employs a similar concept of translation. The notion that changes in the lifeworld would enable the social sciences to incorporate potentialities is more plausible than these speculations about a successor natural science. But Marcuse’s assumption that such changes would occur after a socialist revolution has been overtaken by the actual development of social movements challenging the socially embedded technosciences. The reciprocal interaction between science and society in the struggle for a liveable world is now a present phenomenon, no longer a distant revolutionary prospect.

    Schlagwörter

    Contemporary Philosophy | Philosophy of Science

    Loading...