-
Against Mind-Dependence Ruloff, Cp 2014 Philo , Vol. 17 , Issue 1 , S. 92 ff. ( Zeitschrift ) Englisch 1098-3570 | 2154-1639 10.5840/Philo20141716 Abstract
Paul Gould has recently defended Quentin Smith’s conceptualist argument for a single omniscient mind by developing a sub-argument for a crucial premise of Smith’s argument, namely, a premise that asserts that, necessarily, for any proposition p, p must be the effect of a mind. In this paper, I argue via reductio that Gould’s argument for this particular premise fails.
SchlagwörterPhilosophy and Religion
Loading...
-
keine Heimatbibliothek ausgewählt
-
-
Lizenziert
-
Open-Access
-
Externe Weblinks
- keine externen Weblinks
Ruloff, Cp
Philosophy and Religion