Zugriff nicht möglich

Sie müssen angemeldet sein und ausreichende Berechtigungen haben, um Zugriff auf diese Seite zu erhalten.

  • Correlations and Conclusions : Neuroscience and the Belief in God Flores, Dan 2014 Philo , Vol. 17 , Issue 1 , S. 5 ff. ( Zeitschrift ) Englisch 1098-3570 | 2154-1639 10.5840/Philo20141711 Abstract

    Interest in the nature of religious and mystical experiences (henceforth RMEs) is old. Recently, this interest has shifted toward understanding the relationship between brain function and RMEs. In the first section, I introduce neurocognitive data from three experiments that strongly correlate the report of religious mystical experiences with specific neural activity. Although correlations cannot be considered as “absolute” proof, strong correlations provide us with inductive grounds for justifying the belief or nonbelief of some proposition. These data suggest that the human brain plays a key role in having an RME and will provide support for the claim that our explanations for phenomena should be located in the natural world. In the next section, I explore the meaning of an RME from a Jamesian perspective and discuss the use of RMEs and the apparent design of the world as proof for God’s existence. My point is to show that the whole enterprise of using phenomena “that only God could have brought about” as the proof for God’s existence is inherently question begging and so is no proof that God exists. In the third section, I lay out in detail my assumptions for my main argument in the final section. There, I argue that belief in the supernatural is not justifiable given the data we have from contemporary science and basic rules of reasoning.

    Schlagwörter

    Philosophy and Religion

    Loading...